I'm surprised (not really) that many who espouse "family values" also champion the Second Amendment.
I'm already on record repudiating the Second Amendment.
But consider this real-world scenario.
Given Obama's record of job destruction (over 90% of jobs created in his administration are part-time; unemployment statistics are vastly understated), imagine your neighbor -- desperate for a job to feed his family -- answers a public announcement in the classifieds of government jobs opening up. He applies and gets a job going door-to-door confiscating guns.
Charlton Heston famously quipped that if they came for his gun, they'd have to pry it from his cold dead fingers.
Of course, no defender of the Second Amendment expects to have cold dead fingers. He intends to make sure the jackbooted government thug coming for guns is the one who has the cold dead fingers.
That sounds macho enough, but the "jackbooted government thug" is your next-door neighbor.
And your claim boils down to this:
"It is more important that I retain possession of a firearm than it is for the kid next door to have a father."
Obviously, once the kid next door loses his father, you will have your gun pried from your cold dead fingers by a vastly superior armed federalized SWAT team that was backing up your next door neighbor.
The time for armed revolution against the tyranny in Washington D.C. has long passed. It's too late for that now.