It's amazing how many self-proclaimed "libertarians" support the Roe v. Wade decision, which unconstitutionally federalized state authority to regulate the murder of pre-born human beings. William Norman Grigg notes,
Although it was swaddled in the language of individual empowerment, the Roe decision was a dramatic victory for collectivism: It enshrined, in what our rulers are pleased to call the “law,” the assumption that a human individual is a “person” only when that status is conferred by the government.
Every argument on behalf of state-imposed population control rejects the concept of individual self-ownership and assumes that human lives – individually and in the aggregate – are a resource to be managed by society’s supervisors on behalf of the “common good.” And, as Ruth Bader Ginsburg correctly intuited in 1973, the Roe vs. Wade decision was a triumph, albeit an incomplete one, for the cause of eugenicist population control.
Grigg unpacks the connection between Roe, Justice Ginsberg, and Obama's new "Science Czar":
Pro Libertate Too Many (Other) People